So I've been floored by the overwhelmingly negative reviews for WWIII, and decided to (temporarily?) resurrect an old feature.
The case against WWIII: "So the problem isn’t really that World War III is little more than a 90 or so page clump of continuity porn. The real issue is that it’s gonzo continuity porn. As in, there’s only forty-five seconds of repartee, if that, before those discrepancies start resolving."
The case against Civil War: Frontline: I think there was something about Youtube. It's been a while, I can't remember.
Yes, I know I'm begging to be called a hypocrite by mentioning Civil War, but (at least re: said miniseries) it seems like the blogosphere is finally napping quietly after throwing a month-long, blue-in-the-face temper tantrum.
Oh, here's a feedback type poll:
(Hey, now I'm kind of remembering why I quit doing these; the constant edits to make sure all my ducks are in a row. Awesome!)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
WW3 seemed like all the pages of script and story the editors threw out, until some intern realized that all the spare crap laying around could generate a few bucks, like the extra features on a DVD.
Post a Comment