-Man, Peter Bagge is my Jack Kirby. Well, actually Jack Kirby is my Jack Kirby, but you probably get what I'm saying. Hate Annual #7 = best "floppy" of the year.
---WARNING: NON-COMICS RELATED CONTENT ---
---(NORMAL SERVICE RESUMES AFTER BREAK)---
I recently said that the MMA blogosphere is worse than the comics blogosphere. Here's a pretty strong example of this in action. Fightlinker, one of the few MMA blogs I actually enjoy (I don't endorse every little bit of it, but I like his general approach quite a bit), called out a couple of blogs for blatant hypocrisy. A little background: mixed martial arts is still a pretty controversial sport (you might remember that Heidi MacDonald got a little grief for covering it, but you might also chalk that up to either (a) straight male comics fans' displeasure at being forced to think about men grappling in their underwear or (b) comics fans' ceaseless complaining about anything and everything, no matter how minor). These days it's as well-regulated as boxing, but there's still a popular misconception that it involves the ritual removal of internal organs as a way of taunting defeated opponents. That really only depends on the ref.
So anyway, there's some promotion out of Brazil which is marketing itself as a genuine vale tudo experience--limited rules (no biting, eye gouging, or nut shots (that's the technical term, I assure you)), no time limit, no gloves. Exactly the image which legitimate MMA promoters are trying to work against, really. Fightlinker points out that one blog (Five Ounces of Pain) which had published editorials condemning this approach is now running advertisements for the company. One of the writers for Five Ounces of Pain shows up to say I don't care as long as we get paid cause my kids' Christmas presents have to come from somewhere (I'm totally not kidding). But there still seems to be a general spirit of collegiality among the bloggers. Not so much the quasi-anonymous comment-leavers, but this is the internet.
So, in what way does this situation most differ from the comics blogosphere?
a. No one in the comics blogosphere would ever think of running banner ads for such a sleazy operation
b. You can run banner ads for sleazy operations (like, say, Platinum), but it's not such an ethical pratfall cause at least they're not promising grievous bodily harm in their ads
c. The people leaving comments on popular MMA blogs are even dumber than the ones who leave comments on popular comics blogs
d. The MMA bloggers disagree with each other, but things don't deteriorate into a tedious snarkfest
e. There aren't enough money marks in comics for anyone to sell out.
Answer at the end of today's post!
---BACK TO COMICS RELATED COVERAGE---
-I didn't expect three packs to be such a popular topic, but then again the ones I encountered in rural South Carolina were pretty lame. Anyone interested in learning more about three bags should check out Mark Evanier's article on the subject.
Hearing so many of you talking about your memories of three packs reminded me of a really bizarre experience from my youth. I was on vacation with my family in Beaufort, SC, probably around 1989 or 1990 or so. I was in the toy section of a K-Mart, looking at some three packs in the children's books section. Some of the packs were ripped open, leaving a few single issues lying around on the shelf. One of them was, believe it or not, a comic by Matt Feazell. I was already familiar with Feazell from his backup strips in Zot! (I wasn't a regular reader, but Eclipse had provided some copies as a giveaway for a convention I'd attended when I was pretty young). But I have no idea how a copy of his comic got on the shelf at K-Mart. Maybe someone was reading it in the store and was accused of shoplifting when he/she tried to leave with it. Maybe it was pre-internet viral marketing. Maybe it really did end up in a three pack somehow!
The problem is, I'm not sure if Feazell ever did a standard sized comic; his website suggests that he's only had "paperback" and minicomic collections. But I remember this being a regular old comic book. So now I'm especially confused. Maybe it was all a dream....
-ANSWER TO BRAIN TEASER: In descending order of correctness: (e), (c) + (d) (TIE), (b), (a)